Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Syam Kumar V.M., J
Muhammed Niyas – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of the criminal case and the prayer for quashing. (Para 1) |
| 2. court's power to quash proceedings based on amicable settlement in personal disputes. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. final order granting the relief of quashing. (Para 5) |
ORDER
Dated this the 26th day of May, 2026 This Crl.M.C. is filed by accused Nos.1 to 4 seeking to quash all further proceedings against the petitioners in C.C.No.520 of 2023 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court - II, Ernakulam arising from Annexure A1 FIR and Annexure A3 Final Report. The offences alleged against the petitioners are punishable under Sections 323, 324, 341, 294(b), 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. The learned Public Prosecutor on instructions, submitted that a statement of the defacto complainants has been obtained confirming that an amicable settlement has been arrived at between the parties and the report that has been received from the concerned Police Station discloses the settlement between the parties as well as the intent of the de facto complainants not to proceed with the criminal proceeding further.
3. The Apex Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab [2012 (4) KLT 108 (SC)], Narinder Singh
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
