SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 31018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Viju Abraham, J
Ragina T.C – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: V.A.Muhammed, M.Sajjad
For the Respondents: Parvathy Kottol

JUDGMENT

Aggrieved by Ext.P4 to the extent it restricts approval and monitory benefits to the petitioner only with effect from 23.01.2023 onwards, petitioner has preferred Ext.P8 revision petition before the 1st respondent Government. Petitioner seeks for an expeditious disposal of the same.

2. Heard the learned Government Pleader also.

After hearing both sides, I am inclined to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P8 revision petition preferred by the petitioner, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and the 5th respondent. A decision in this regard shall be taken within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top