IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Viju Abraham, J
Ragina T.C – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Aggrieved by Ext.P4 to the extent it restricts approval and monitory benefits to the petitioner only with effect from 23.01.2023 onwards, petitioner has preferred Ext.P8 revision petition before the 1st respondent Government. Petitioner seeks for an expeditious disposal of the same.
2. Heard the learned Government Pleader also.
After hearing both sides, I am inclined to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P8 revision petition preferred by the petitioner, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and the 5th respondent. A decision in this regard shall be taken within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.