SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 31020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Viju Abraham, J
Krishnamma K – Appellant
Versus
District Child Development Project Officer – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 21236 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: L. Ram Mohan
For the Respondents: R. Rajpradeep, Swarna Thomas, Sachin Ramesh, Sreedevi S.

A petitioner retains the absolute right to withdraw a writ petition at any stage, and upon formal submission, the court should allow such withdrawal.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking redressal of grievances related to service matters. During the hearing, the petitioner through her counsel submitted a memo requesting the withdrawal of the petition. Following this submission, the court accepted the memo and granted the request to withdraw the matter. The court considered the petitioner's application for withdrawal. The ratio decidendi established is that a petitioner possesses the legal right to abandon or withdraw their litigation at any stage before a final adjudication on the merits. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition. The memo is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top