SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 31022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
J. Nisha Banu, Shoba Annamma Eapen, JJ
Divya V.M – Appellant
Versus
Aniban – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: T.R. Aswas
For the Respondents: T.R. Aswas

Table of Content
1. appellate courts may dismiss child custody appeals when parties reconcile and request withdrawal. (Para 1 , 2)

J.Nisha Banu, J.

The appellant in Mat.Appeal No.122 of 2015 is the wife/counter petitioner and the appellant in Mat.Appeal No.229 of 2015 is the petitioner in O.P.(G&W) No.1865 of 2012 on the file of the Family Court, Thiruvananthapuram. The above O.P.(G&W) was filed seeking permanent custody of the minor children. The Family Court dismissed the petition, reserving liberty to the petitioner to seek visitation and interim custody. Aggrieved by the judgment of the Family Court, the husband and the wife have preferred these appeals.

2. When the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the appellant/husband in Mat.Appeal No.229 of 2015 submitted that the husband and wife are happily living together with their children and therefore, these appeals may be dismissed as not pressed. The said submission is recorded and an endorsement has been made to that effect.

Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed as not pressed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top