SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 31027

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.B. Snehalatha, Judge
V. Muhammed Ali – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Cibi Thomas

Table of Content
1. court's authority to correct clerical errors in judgments. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)

O R D E R

This is a petition to review the judgment passed by this Court on

10.4.2026 on the ground that there is an error in the said judgment in mentioning the rank of the 7th respondent.

2. Heard both sides.

3. A perusal of the judgment sought to be reviewed would show that there occurred an inadvertent mistake in mentioning the rank of the 7th respondent.

4. Accordingly, this review petition stands allowed as follows:

In the impugned judgment, the word “2nd respondent” shall be corrected as “7th respondent”.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top