SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 31031

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Kauser Edappagath, J
Harif T – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 2010 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Krishnapriya Sreekumar
For the Respondents: Sreeja V.

Pre-arrest bail may be granted when the essential ingredients of the alleged offence under the Explosive Substances Act, 1908, are not prima facie established, the recovery is complete, and the applicant has no prior criminal antecedents.

Headnote:The petitioner filed an application under S. 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Ss. 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908. It was alleged that the applicant conducted unlicensed quarrying activities using explosive substances. The court observed that there was no allegation that the explosives were kept with the intent to endanger life or property, and noted that recovery had already been effected. The main issue for consideration was whether the petitioner was entitled to pre-arrest bail given the nature of the allegations and the status of the investigation. The court reasoned that since the essential ingredients of the alleged offence were not clearly established, and considering the applicant had no criminal antecedents and that custodial interrogation was unnecessary, the bail should be granted. The application is allowed subject to conditions including executing a bond with sureties and cooperating with the ongoing investigation.

Table of Content
1. nature of the accusations regarding unlicensed explosive use in quarrying. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. parties' contentions regarding the necessity of custodial interrogation. (Para 4 , 5)

O R D E R

This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS), seeking pre-

arrest bail.

2. The applicant is the sole accused in Crime No.289/2026 of Perinthalmanna Police Station, Malappuram District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 14.03.2026, at Chengana, the applicant was found conducting unlicensed quarrying activities using explosive substances and thereby committed the aforesaid offences.

4. I have heard Smt.Krishnapriya Sreekumar, the learned counsel for the applicant and Smt.Sreeja V., the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the above crime. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. The learned Senior Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, submitted that the alleged incident occurred as part of the applicant's intentional criminal acts, and if he is released on bail at this stage, it will affect the course of the investigation. 6. The prosecution allegation is that the applicant conducts quarrying without a licence. In order to attract Section 4 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908, the explosive must be kept with the intent to endanger life or cause serious injury to the property. There is no such allegation. That apart, recovery has been effected. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. Considering the allegations made against the applicant, his custodial interrogation seems unnecessary. For these reasons, I find this to be an appropriate case to grant pre-arrest bail to the applicant.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail in the event of his arrest on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer, as the case may be.

(ii) The applicant shall fully cooperate with the investigation, including subjecting himself to the deemed police custody for discovery, if any, as and when demanded.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m. and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top