SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 31137

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. Badharudeen, J
Viji – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
CRL.A NO. 1961 OF 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: V.A.Ajivas
For the Respondents: Vipin Narayana

An appellate court may reduce a default sentence of imprisonment to facilitate an appellant's release when the substantive sentence has already been served and the modification is unopposed by the prosecution.

Headnote:The appellant, convicted under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, challenged the sentencing portion of the judgment passed by the Special Court. The appellant had already undergone rigorous imprisonment exceeding the substantive sentence of four years. The court verified the custody period as reported by the prison authorities. The primary issue was whether the default sentence could be modified to facilitate the appellant's release, given that the appellant had served the substantive sentence. The court noted that the prison report confirmed the appellant had completed the four-year substantive term along with additional time. The court reasoned that in light of the period already served, reducing the default imprisonment was appropriate and in the interest of justice, especially with no opposition from the State. This appeal stands allowed as indicated above.

Table of Content
1. overview of the primary sentencing and the appeal against the conviction. (Para 1 , 2)
2. discretionary reduction of default imprisonment sentence upon serving the substantive term. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)

JUDGMENT

This is an appeal filed challenging judgment in SC (NDPS) No.69 of 2020 on the files of the Special Court (NDPS Act cases), Thodupuzha.

2. The sentence imposed against the accused reads as under:-

“The accused is convicted and sentenced u/s.235 of Cr.P.C. to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of four (4) years and pay fine of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh only) in default of payment of fine, the accused shall undergo a further period of rigorous imprisonment for one (1) year.”

3. At the time of hearing, the learned legal aid counsel submitted that in this case the substantive sentence is four years and the default sentence is for one year. On perusal of the report forwarded by the Superintendent of Police, Central Prison and Correctional Home, Kannur as on 08.04.2026, the appellant completed 4 years, 5 months and 28 days imprisonment. Therefore, the learned counsel for the appellant submitted that reduction in the default sentence less than one year would facilitate the release of the appellant on completion of sentence and the said prayer alone is canvassed, after confirming the sentence.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor not opposed the reduction of default sentence, after confirming the conviction as submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant/accused.

5. In view of the above, the default sentence imposed against the appellant shall stand reduced for a period of eight months and the Jail Superintendent concerned is directed to release the appellant/accused in completion of substantive sentence imposed by the special court and modified default sentence of eight months, if his presence for custody is not required for any other purpose, while confirming the conviction and the substantive sentence.

This appeal stands allowed as indicated above.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top