Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Easwaran S., J
Kalathingal Ibrahim – Appellant
Versus
Kareran Nakan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural dispute regarding an unadjudicated delay condonation application. (Para 1) |
| 2. requirement for a reasoned order when condoning delay in appeals. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. remand to the appellate authority for deciding on delay application. (Para 5) |
EASWARAN S., J --------------------------------------------
C.R.P.(LR) No.133 of 2017 --------------------------------------------
Dated this the 21st day of May, 2026 ORDER The first respondent before the Appellate Authority (LR), Thrissur, in A.A.No.22 of 2016, is the revision petitioner. In a suo motu proceeding, S.M.No.1766 of 2006 dated 30.11.2006, the revision petitioner was issued a purchase certificate by the Land Tribunal, Manjeri. The purchase certificate was challenged before the Appellate Authority (LR), Thrissur, in A.A.No.22 of 2016. Along with the appeal, the first respondent - appellant filed I.A.No.28 of 2016, an application to condone the delay of nine years and two months in filing the appeal. The petitioner appeared and objected to the condonation of delay by filing an objection. While the matter stood thus, the Appellate Authority, for the reason best known, did not pass a separate order touching upon t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
