SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 69884

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
JEENA MARIA N FRANCIS – Appellant
Versus
NOBLE THOMAS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN &

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.B. SNEHALATHA FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY 2025 / 4TH MAGHA, 1946 MAT.APPEAL NO. 770 OF 2024 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 15.05.2024 IN OP NO.91 OF 2024 OF FAMILY COURT, MUVATTUPUZHA APPELLANT/PETITIONER:

JEENA MARIA N FRANCIS, AGED 41 YEARS D/O N.V FRANCIS, NANGELIMALIL HOUSE, PULLUVAZHY P.O, RAYAMANGALAM, ERNAKULAM, PIN- 683541, REP. BY HER POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SRI N.V.FRANCIS, AGED 72 YEARS, S/O VARKEY, NANGELIMALIL HOUSE, PULLUVAZHY P.O, RAYAMANGALAM, ERNAKULAM, PIN- 683 541.

BY ADVS.T.M.RAMAN KARTHA MANJULA NAIR REVATHY M.A.

GREESHMA T.G.

RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:

NOBLE THOMAS, S/O K C STHANISLAVOSE, KALAMBADAN HOUSE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, VENGOOR VILLAGE, NEDUNGAPRA P.O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN 683 545 THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24.01.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT Devan Ramachandran. J.

The appellant calls into question the correctness of the judgment of the learned Family Court, Muvattupuzha in O.P.No.91/2024.

2. The appellant is stated to be the mother of three minor girls and she filed the Origin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top