IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
JULY – Appellant
Versus
GIREESH – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN &
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN THURSDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2025 / 17TH MAGHA, 1946 MAT.APPEAL NO. 432 OF 2015 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 04.07.2014 IN OP NO.577 OF 2012 OF FAMILY COURT, NEDUMANGAD APPELLANT/PETITIONER:
JULY AGED 23 YEARS, D/O.BABU, BABU NIVAS, MUDAVARAM, MUTHRANIKETHAN PO, VELLANADU, VELLANADU VILLAGE, NEDUMANGAD.
BY ADV SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:
GIREESH AGED 33 YEARS, S/O.CLEMENT, GIREESH BHAVAN, CONVENT ROAD, NEAR CONVENT JUNCTION, ARYANADU PO, CHULLIMANOOR, NEDUMANGAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV SRI.T.K.ANANDA KRISHNAN THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON 06.02.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
SATHISH NINAN & SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN, JJ.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Dated this the 6th day of February, 2025
JUDGMENT
Sathish Ninan, J.
The original petition filed by the wife against the husband, for return of gold and money, was decreed in part by the Family Court. Challenging that part of the decree which refused relief to the wife, she is in appeal.
2.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.