SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 31251

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Kauser Edappagath, J
Ubaiskhan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 2796 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: A. Rajasimhan, Vykhari K.U.
For the Respondents: K.A. Noushad

Bail is granted when continued judicial custody is deemed unnecessary for investigation purposes, particularly where the accused has no criminal antecedents, the investigation is significantly advanced, and the allegations involve a long-standing relationship with elements of consent.

Headnote:The petitioner sought regular bail under S. 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, regarding a case involving offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. The petitioner was accused of sexual offences stemming from a long-term relationship initiated when the survivor was a minor. The court observed that the investigation was nearing completion, the petitioner lacked prior criminal history, and the relationship documented in the First Information Statement appeared largely consensual despite the promise to marry. The primary issue concerned whether continued pre-trial detention was necessary given the nature of the allegations and the status of the investigation. The Court reasoned that given the circumstances—specifically the lack of prior criminal antecedents, the advanced stage of the investigation, and the consensual nature of the relationship described—there was no justification for continued incarceration. In the result, the application for bail was allowed subject to specified conditions regarding witness non-interference, periodic reporting to the police, residency restrictions, and financial surety.

Table of Content
1. nature of the application and the underlying criminal charges. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. submission of arguments from both the applicant and the state. (Para 4 , 5)

O R D E R

This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS), seeking regular bail.

2. The applicant is the sole accused in Crime No.495/2026 of Ollur Police Station, Thrissur District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 69 and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 6 read with Section 5(l) and Section 12 read with Section 11(iv) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the applicant had raped the survivor from 28.10.2018, when she was only 16 years old, to February 2026 at his house in Aryanad and at various places, then promised to marry her, later cheated her by not refunding Rs.4,30,000/- and thereby committed the aforesaid offences.

4. I have heard Sri.A.Rajasimhan, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri.K.A.Noushad, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicant with the alleged crime; hence, he is entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicant, and he is not entitled to bail at this stage.

6. The applicant was remanded to judicial custody on

29.04.2026. At present, the applicant is aged 30 years and the victim is aged 24 years. A reading of the FIS would show that they were in a relationship since 2018 and had voluntary consensual sexual intercourse several times. There was consensual sex during the minority of the victim and even after the victim attained majority. According to the victim, she consented to sex since the applicant promised that he would marry her. However, she admits that she knew that the applicant was a married person. The investigation is almost over. The applicant has no criminal antecedents. For these reasons, I do not find any reason to hold that the continued detention of the applicant is required for any purpose. Hence, the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions: -

(i) The applicant shall be released on bail on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Magistrate/Court.

(ii) The applicant shall fully co-operate with the investigation.

(iii) The applicant shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. He shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicant shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicant shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicant shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of the bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top