JUDGMENT

The above contempt case is filed alleging violation of the directions in Annexure A1 judgment. It would better to extract the relevant portion of the directions in Annexure A1 judgment;

“1. Respondents 1 and 2 are directed to comply the directions in Ext.P29 order passed by the Tribunal, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and the 6^th respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

2. The 1^st and 2^nd respondents will also consider Ext.P31, P32 and P33 in accordance with the law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and the 6th respondent during the above period itself.

3. The Municipality will unlock the building. But I make it clear that no business shall be conducted in the building without getting licence/permission from the Municipality.” [SIC]

2. Now an order is passed consequent to Annexure A1 judgment as evident by Annexure A3. The grievance of the petitioner is that, no consequen