Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.Ravi, J
Peter – Appellant
Versus
Jaimon Joseph – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of procedural history regarding the challenged injunction orders. (Para 1) |
| 2. refusal to interfere with concurrent findings under supervisory jurisdiction. (Para 2) |
| 3. court directs expedited trial of the underlying suit. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
The plaintiff has filed this original petition. The interlocutory application filed for interim injunction was dismissed by Ext.P4 order. The order was challenged in appeal by the petitioner and the First Appellate Court concurred with the finding of the trial court and dismissed the CM Appeal by Ext.P6 order dated 09.09.2025. It is the said order that is challenged in this original petition.
2. In exercise of the jurisdiction under Article 227, it is not proper for this Court to interfere with the well considered order of the trial court which has been affirmed by the First Appellate Court.
3. The counsel for the petitioner prayed that if the court is not inclined, the suit may be directed to be expedited.
In view of the above submission, this original petition is disposed of affirming Exts.P4 and P6 orders and directing the Munsiff Court, Ettumanoor to consider and dispose of OS.No.2 of 2024, at the earliest, at any rate w
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
