SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 31987

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Viju Abraham, J
Vijeesh S – Appellant
Versus
Malabar Devaswom Board – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Binoy Vasudevan, Sreejith Sreenath, Rincy Khader, K.V. Rajeswari
For the Respondents: R. Ranjanie, K. Mohanakannan, Maya S. Kumar

Table of Content
1. court mandate for time-bound disposal of statutory appeals. (Para 1 , 2)

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 26th day of May, 2026 Aggrieved by Ext.P5 order of termination, petitioner has preferred Ext.P6 appeal before the 2nd respondent. Petitioner seeks for an expeditious disposal of the same.

2. The learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 and 2 submits that an appropriate decision will be taken on Ext.P6 appeal without any delay.

Taking into consideration the above facts and circumstances, I am inclined to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P6 appeal, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and respondents 4 and 5. A decision in this regard shall be taken within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top