SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 32021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. Jayachandran, J
C. Chellam – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 8137 OF 2013



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Santhan V.Nair, V.Gopikrishna, V.V.Mithun, B.Rajesh
For the Respondents: P.K.Manojkumar, N.Nandakumara Menon, Deepa Narayanan

A court will dismiss a petition as infructuous when the counsel for the petitioner acknowledges that the grounds for the relief sought no longer exist or the remedy is no longer viable.

Headnote:The proceedings concern a Writ Petition wherein the petitioner sought relief through judicial intervention. Upon the matter coming up for admission, the petitioner's counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous due to a change in circumstances. The core issue before the court was the viability of the petition in light of the counsel's submission. Following the principle that courts do not adjudicate upon matters that have lost their practical utility or relevancy, the court accepted the statement provided by the legal counsel. The Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that this Writ Petition has become infructuous.

The submission is recorded and this Writ petition will stand dismissed as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top