SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 32152

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Murali Purushothaman, J
C. R. Rajan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 34591 OF 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: P.Sivaraj, Megha.M.S.
For the Respondents: S.Subhash Chand, Lejo Joseph George, M.V.S.Nampoothiry, P.S Appu

A petitioner has the right to withdraw a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, and upon the filing of a 'not-pressed' memo, the court will dismiss the petition as withdrawn.

Headnote:The proceedings concern an application for withdrawal of a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petitioner challenged administrative actions pertaining to construction activities within a municipal area. Upon the filing of a not-pressed memo, the Court exercised its discretion to permit the withdrawal of the matter. The primary issue before the Court was whether the petitioner could be permitted to withdraw the writ petition at the admission stage. Relying on the procedural autonomy of parties to abandon their claims, the Court held that a request to not press the petition entitles the party to a dismissal. The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

JUDGMENT

The learned Counsel for the petitioner has filed a not pressed memo.

The same is accepted and the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top