The proceedings concern an application for withdrawal of a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petitioner challenged administrative actions pertaining to construction activities within a municipal area. Upon the filing of a not-pressed memo, the Court exercised its discretion to permit the withdrawal of the matter. The primary issue before the Court was whether the petitioner could be permitted to withdraw the writ petition at the admission stage. Relying on the procedural autonomy of parties to abandon their claims, the Court held that a request to not press the petition entitles the party to a dismissal. The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.