SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 32161

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.M. Manoj, J
G. Velayudhan – Appellant
Versus
District Collector – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 17438 OF 2020



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: V. Premchand
For the Respondents: Pratheesh.P, Anjana Kannath, Jimmy George

A writ petition may be closed when the underlying controversy between the parties has been resolved, rendering the petition infructuous.

Headnote:The proceedings initiated involve a dispute over land survey and boundaries. The petitioners challenged certain administrative actions concerning property measurement. Upon review, it was reported that the core issues had been resolved. The central issue was whether the administrative survey actions remained valid and necessary for judicial intervention. The court reasoned that since the parties indicated that the cause of action had ceased to exist, judicial interference was no longer required. The writ petition is closed.

Table of Content
1. closure of infructuous writ petition upon settlement of issues. (Para 1 , 2)

JUDGMENT

The issues raised in the writ petition is stated to be no longer in existence.

2.In the above circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing survives for consideration in the writ petition and seeks closure of the same.

Taking note of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top