SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 32269

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Kauser Edappagath, J
Hafsal A.K – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 2635 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: P.Mohamed Sabah, Libin Stanley, Saipooja, Sadik Ismayil, R.Gayathri, M.Mahin Hamza, Alwin Joseph, Benson Ambrose
For the Respondents: K.A. Noushad

The mandate to furnish written grounds of arrest to an arrestee and their relative under the BNSS and Art.22(1) of the Constitution operates prospectively; arrests made prior to such clarifying precedents are valid if grounds were communicated via alternative modes.

Headnote:The petitioner sought regular bail under S.483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, following his arrest for possession of narcotic substances (Methamphetamine and ganja) under the NDPS Act, 1985. The petitioner contended that the arrest was illegal due to the failure to communicate the grounds of arrest to his relatives in writing, as required by recent constitutional interpretations. The Court examined the compliance with S.47 and S.48 of the BNSS and reviewed the procedural requirements for communicating grounds of arrest. The main issue was whether the failure to provide written grounds of arrest to the accused's relatives vitiated the arrest, given the retrospective applicability of recent Supreme Court directives. The Court noted that earlier mandates regarding the written communication of grounds of arrest to arrestees and relatives, clarified in recent rulings, operate prospectively. Since the arrest predated the clarifying judgment, the Court held that oral communication over the phone satisfied the requirements in force at the time of the arrest. The application for bail was dismissed.

Table of Content
1. procedural context for bail under ndps. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. prospective application of requirements for written grounds of arrest. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)

ORDER

This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking regular bail.

2. The applicant is the accused No.1 in Crime No.82/2025 of Sulthanbathery Excise Range Office, Wayanad District. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii)(A), 22(c) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, NDPS Act).

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that pursuant to a secret information received by the Excise Inspector, Excise Intelligent and Investigation Bureau, Wayanad, regarding transportation of contraband articles and consequent passing of that information to the Excise Inspector, Sulthanbathery, he along with his excise party who were engaged in vehicle checking duties along the Kollagal-Kozhikode National Highway in Noolpuzha village of Sulthanbathery taluk and on 08.07.2025 at about 11.15 a.m., flagged down a bus bearing Reg. No. TN-73AK-6262 and on search of the bus, they found the accused No.1 in possession of 131.925 grams of Methamphetamine and 460 grams of ganja concealed in the pocket of the pants worn by him, in contravention of the provisions of NDPS Act and rules made there under.

4. I have heard Sri.P.Mohamed Sabah, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri. K.A.Noushad, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant has been in custody since 08.07.2025, and the grounds of arrest were not communicated in accordance with the law at the time of his arrest. The learned Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, opposed the bail application and submitted that the grounds of arrest were duly communicated.

6. Though prima facie there are materials on record to connect the applicant with the crime, since the applicant has raised a question of absence of communication of the grounds of his arrest, let me consider the same.

7. It is now well settled that the requirement to inform a person of the grounds for arrest is a mandatory requirement of Art.22(1) of the Constitution and Section 47 of BNSS, and absence of the same would render the arrest illegal [See. Pankaj Bansal v. Union of India and Others, (2024) 7 SCC

576, Prabir Purkayastha v. State (NCT of Delhi), (2024) 8 SCC 254, Vihaan Kumar v. State of Haryana and Others (2025 SCC OnLine SC 269)]. Recently in Mihir Rajesh Shah v. State of Maharashtra and Another (2025 SCC OnLine SC 2356), the three-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court held that grounds of arrest must be informed to the arrested person in every case without exception, and the mode of communication of such grounds must be in writing in the language he understands. It was further held that non-supply of grounds of arrest in writing to the arrestee before or immediately after arrest would not vitiate such arrest, provided said grounds are supplied in writing within a reasonable time and in any case two hours before the production of the arrestee before the Magistrate. However, it was clarified that the requirement to communicate the written grounds of arrest to the arrestee would only operate prospectively.

8. The Supreme Court in Kasireddy Upender Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2025 SCC OnLine SC 1228) has held that the grounds of arrest should not only be provided to the arrestee but also to his family members and relatives so that necessary arrangements are made to secure the release of the person arrested at the earliest possible opportunity so as to make the mandate of Art.22(1) meaningful and effective, failing which, such arrest would be rendered illegal. A learned Single Judge of this Court in Alvin Riby v. State of Kerala (2025 KER 67079) following Kasireddy Upender Reddy (supra) held that failure to communicate the grounds of arrest to the near relatives renders

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top