SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 32300

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. Girish, J
Suryadev – Appellant
Versus
Sughosh G – Respondent
TR.P(CRL.) NO.10 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: R. Leela, Arjun Gopal P, Jahnavi J. Nair, Aishwarya M. S.
For the Respondents: P.P. Blessy Mol, M.K. Rajitha

The court has the discretion to transfer family court proceedings when the petitioner demonstrates legitimate personal hardship and the respondent offers no objection, ensuring convenience for the parties.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a petition for transfer of a maintenance case from the Family Court, Ernakulam, to the Family Court, Ettumanoor. The facts indicate that the petitioner, a minor, resides in Kottayam due to his mother's transfer, making attendance at the original venue inconvenient. The court found sufficient grounds for the request. The core issue is whether the hardship faced by a minor petitioner in attending court proceedings warrants a transfer of the case. The court reasoned that facilitating accessibility for the petitioner is essential when the respondent has no objection to the transfer, thereby ensuring the efficient administration of justice. In the result, the petition is allowed, and the case is ordered to be transferred to the Family Court, Ettumanoor.

Table of Content
1. discretionary power to transfer cases for the sake of party convenience. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)

ORDER

The petitioner in M.C.No.281 of 2024 on the files of the Family Court, Ernakulam, a minor boy represented by his mother, has filed this petition for the transfer of the aforesaid case to the Family Court, Ettumanoor.

2. The reason stated is that, in connection with the transfer of the mother of the petitioner to Kottayam, the petitioner is admitted in a School at Kottayam, and they are residing there. Thus, it is stated that the appearance of the petitioner at the Family Court, Ernakulam, would cause much hardship to him.

3. The respondent appeared through his counsel and submitted that there is no objection in transferring the case from Family Court, Ernakulam to Family Court, Ettumanoor.

4. Having regard to the reason stated by the petitioner, I deem it appropriate to allow the transfer petition.

In the result, the petition stands allowed. M.C.No.281 of 2024 pending before the Family Court, Ernakulam, is ordered to be transferred to the Family Court, Ettumanoor. The parties are directed to make appearance before the Family Court, Ettumanoor, on 02.07.2026.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top