When a writ petition's grievances are resolved through compliance with administrative orders during the pendency of the litigation, the petition becomes infructuous and is liable to be closed.

JUDGMENT

This Writ Petition (C) is filed seeking the following reliefs:

" (i) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or direction compelling and commanding the respondents 3 and 4 to act upon the Exhibit P3 and P7 issued by the fourth respondent, by demolishing the illegal construction of wall, by hindering the pathway of the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, to secure the ends of justice.

(ii) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or direction compelling and commanding the respondents 3 and 4 to ensure that the 5^th respondent shall not be allowed to hinder the peaceful, ingress and egress, through the joint pathway property, which have now turned into part of public road, in the interest of justice.

(iii) To dispense with the production of the translation of vernacular documents that is submitted in this Writ Petition.

(iv) Such other relief’s as this Hon’ble Court deems fit to grant in the nature of this case."

[SIC]

2. The main prayer in this writ petition is to implement Ext.P7 order, which is admittedly a provisional order passed by the Panchayat. Now, it is submitted that a consequential order has been passed, and the wall has also been demolished. If that is the case, the prayers in this writ petition are infructuous.

In the light of the above facts, this writ petition is closed. If there is any fresh cause of action to the petitioner, the same is left open.