SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 32863

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Harisankar V. Menon, J
Madhav R. Chandra – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 12108 OF 2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: P.Mohandas, K.P.Satheesan, K.Sudhinkumar, S.K.Adhithyan, Sabu Pullan, Gokul D. Sudhakaran
For the Respondents: Sylaja S.L.

The standardization of academic marks for undergraduate admissions is a policy matter to be determined by the government upon consideration of representations submitted by affected parties.

Headnote:The petitioners, appearing through guardians, sought a directive for the standardization or normalization of marks across different educational boards for admission to undergraduate courses, citing the disparity in assessment models compared to professional courses. Representations were submitted to the state authorities, which remained unaddressed. The court framed the issue as whether to compel the government to evaluate the request for mark normalization given the petitioners' concerns regarding equitable admission standards. The court determined that the policy-level decision regarding the standardization of marks falls within the executive domain rather than judicial determination. The writ petition was disposed of with a directive to the 1st respondent to consider and dispose of the representation within six months.

Table of Content
1. the court directed the government to consider the petitioners' request for mark normalization as a policy decision. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)

JUDGMENT

Heard Sri.K.Sudhinkumar, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Smt.Sylaja S.L., learned Government Pleader.

2. The petitioners are the parents of the students, who have appeared for the Class XII examinations under the CBSE scheme. The petitioners point out that when their wards seek admission to the decree courses, there is no standardization/normalization of the marks with reference to the marks awarded across the different Boards, as is provided in the admission to the professional courses. In such circumstances, the petitioners have submitted Ext.P2 representation to the respondents herein pointing out the requirement for standardization/normalization of the marks while providing for admission to the under graduate courses.

3. In my opinion, it is for the Government to consider the afore representation and pass appropriate orders.

4. Therefore, this writ petition would stand disposed of, directing the 1st respondent herein to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P2, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top