IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Gopinath P., J
Sritransways Logistics Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Kerala Pradesh Petrol Bunk Mazdoor Sangh – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 11490 OF 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. strikes in public utility services during pending conciliation are illegal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this Court being aggrieved by the fact that the 1st respondent -union has resorted to an illegal strike without notice as mandated by Section 22 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner is undertaking public utility services and is engaged in the transportation and distribution of petroleum gas and other related products. It is also the case of the petitioner that the dispute in respect of which the strike has been called/held by the 1st respondent-union is pending conciliation before the Conciliation Officer. It is submitted that the strike pending conciliation is illegal.
2. When this matter came up for consideration before this Court on 21-03-2025, this Court passed the following order:
“Issue notice by speed post to the
1st respondent. The learned Central Government Counsel takes notice for the 2nd respondent.
2. The petitioner is a service provider engaged in the transportation and distribution of petroleum gas and related products. The 1st respondent union has called for strike as per Ext.P5. It is submitted that the petitioner is a public utility service under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short ‘the Act’) and that conciliation proceedings are pending before the Regional Joint Labour Commissioner, Kollam. 3. In view of the above submissions, I am prima facie satisfied that the strike called for by the 1st respondent as per Ext.P5 notice is in breach of the provisions under Section 22(1)(d) of the Act. 4. There will be an interim direction as prayed for, for a period of two months.
Post on 19.05.2025. ”
3. Despite service of notice, there is no representation for the 1st respondent.
4. A perusal of the interim order dated 21-03-2025 indicates that this Court was inclined to pass an interim order taking into consideration the submission that conciliation proceedings are pending. Since it is stated before me that the conciliation proceedings are still pending, the interim order dated 21-03-2025 is made absolute, and it is made clear that the 1st respondent shall not resort to a strike pending the conciliation proceedings.
The writ petition is ordered accordingly.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.