SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 33002

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Gopinath P., J
Sritransways Logistics Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Kerala Pradesh Petrol Bunk Mazdoor Sangh – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 11490 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Abel Tom Benny, D.Prem Kamath, Tom Thomas (Kakkuzhiyil), Aaron Zacharias Benny, Alan J Yogyaveedu, Mathew Angelo Davis, Bijitha B. Bose, Jyothika Krishna
For the Respondents: O.M.Shalina

A strike initiated by a trade union in a public utility service is illegal under Section 22 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, if it occurs while conciliation proceedings are pending before the appropriate labor authority.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking to restrain the respondent union from engaging in strike activities in a public utility service, asserting a breach of Section 22 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The court confirmed that the petitioner, engaged in the transportation and distribution of petroleum products, qualifies as a public utility service and that strike action taken while conciliation proceedings remain pending is illegal under statutory provisions. Following an interim direction, the court found the respondent failed to appear, rendering the previous restraint order absolute. The primary issue concerns whether a trade union can lawfully initiate an strike while conciliation proceedings are actively pending before the competent authority. The court reasoned that in view of the statutory bar under Section 22(1)(d) of the Act, which prohibits strikes in public utility services during the pendency of conciliation, the union is precluded from such industrial action. The court affirmed that stability in essential service delivery must be maintained during the pendency of legal conciliation efforts. The writ petition is ordered accordingly.

Table of Content
1. strikes in public utility services during pending conciliation are illegal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court being aggrieved by the fact that the 1st respondent -union has resorted to an illegal strike without notice as mandated by Section 22 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner is undertaking public utility services and is engaged in the transportation and distribution of petroleum gas and other related products. It is also the case of the petitioner that the dispute in respect of which the strike has been called/held by the 1st respondent-union is pending conciliation before the Conciliation Officer. It is submitted that the strike pending conciliation is illegal.

2. When this matter came up for consideration before this Court on 21-03-2025, this Court passed the following order:

“Issue notice by speed post to the

1st respondent. The learned Central Government Counsel takes notice for the 2nd respondent.

2. The petitioner is a service provider engaged in the transportation and distribution of petroleum gas and related products. The 1st respondent union has called for strike as per Ext.P5. It is submitted that the petitioner is a public utility service under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short ‘the Act’) and that conciliation proceedings are pending before the Regional Joint Labour Commissioner, Kollam. 3. In view of the above submissions, I am prima facie satisfied that the strike called for by the 1st respondent as per Ext.P5 notice is in breach of the provisions under Section 22(1)(d) of the Act. 4. There will be an interim direction as prayed for, for a period of two months.

Post on 19.05.2025. ”

3. Despite service of notice, there is no representation for the 1st respondent.

4. A perusal of the interim order dated 21-03-2025 indicates that this Court was inclined to pass an interim order taking into consideration the submission that conciliation proceedings are pending. Since it is stated before me that the conciliation proceedings are still pending, the interim order dated 21-03-2025 is made absolute, and it is made clear that the 1st respondent shall not resort to a strike pending the conciliation proceedings.

The writ petition is ordered accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top