Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. Badharudeen, J
Nakulan K A – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. relitigation of bail applications requires demonstrating a change in circumstances. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. judicial oversight regarding the effectiveness of police investigations. (Para 4) |
ORDER
Dated this the 1st day of June, 2026 This is the 2nd bail application No.37 in Crime No.165 of 2021 of CBCID, Thrissur under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, apprehending arrest at the instance of the Investigating Officer.
2. The petitioner along with other accused have filed an earlier bail application vide B.A. No.13766 of 2025. This Court dismissed the same as per order dated 02.12.2025 and the order is as under:
“This anticipatory bail application has been filed by accused Nos.30 to 33 and 35 to 37 in Crime No.165/2021 of CBCID, Thrissur, under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, apprehending arrest at the instance of the Investigating Officer.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Additional Director General of Prosecution appearing for the State of Kerala.
3. Here, the prosecution allegation is that, accused Nos.1 to 37 have committed offences punishable under Sections 406, 408, 417, 418,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
