Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.Kunhikrishnan, J
Sebin T.D – Appellant
Versus
Avinissery Grama Panchayat – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. prayer for judicial intervention to compel consideration of pending administrative representation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's discretion to grant interim protection pending administrative decision-making. (Para 3 , 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 2nd Respondent to consider and dispose Ext. P3 within a time frame to be fixed by this Hon’ble Court.
ii. Pass appropriate orders staying all coercive steps pursuant to Ext. P2, pending disposal of Ext. P3 Represntation.
iii. Such other appropriate writ, order, or direction that this Hon’ble court may deem fit and necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case and award costs."
[SIC]
2. The petitioner submitted Ext.P3 representation before the 2nd respondent. Now, the petitioner apprehends that coercive steps will be taken based on Ext.P2 order. Hence, this Writ Petition is filed.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. The manner in which this Writ Petition is going to be disposed of, no notice is necessary to the respondents. If the respondents are aggrieved by any of the directi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
