SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 33434

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Devan Ramachandran, Basant Balaji, JJ
Kerala Public Service Commission – Appellant
Versus
Renjith K. – Respondent
WA NO. 664 OF 2019



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: P.C.Sasidharan

An appellate court will dismiss an appeal as infructuous when the main writ petition, from which the interim order was challenged, has already been disposed of by the original court.

Headnote:The proceedings concern a Writ Appeal filed against an interim order in a writ petition. Upon representation by the Standing Counsel that the underlying writ petition was already disposed of, the appellants sought to withdraw the appeal. The issue for consideration was whether the appeal survived or was necessitated in light of the disposal of the original writ petition. The court reasoned that in view of the submission that the main petition was adjudicated, the appeal became infructuous and was not pressed by the appellants. The appeal is dismissed, without entering into the merits of any of the rival contentions.

JUDGMENT

Sri.P.C.Sasidharan – the learned Standing Counsel for the appellants submitted that this appeal is not being pressed, because, subsequent to the interim order impugned, the original petition itself has been disposed of.

In the afore circumstances this appeal is dismissed, without entering into the merits of any of the rival contentions.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top