SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 33662

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Bechu Kurian Thomas, J
Pushpagiri College Of Pharmacy – Appellant
Versus
Pharmacy Council Of India – Respondent
WP(C) No. 10888 of 2026



Important Points

When a petitioner explicitly states that the cause of action in a writ petition no longer survives, the court shall close the proceedings as infructuous.

Subject

Civil Law - Writ Jurisdiction

Headnote

The petitioner sought relief regarding administrative decisions communicated by the respondent. Upon hearing the counsel, the court noted that the issues raised had become infructuous. The main issue was whether the grievances persist. The court reasoned that since the petitioner's counsel admitted the issue no longer survives, there was no legal cause of action remaining for adjudication. The writ petition is closed.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ajith George Koola, Tony George Kannanthanam, Thomas George, Ebee Antony

JUDGMENT

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue raised in this writ petition does not survive any more and requested that the matter be closed.

In view of the above submission, this writ petition is closed.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top