Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ajith George Koola, Tony George Kannanthanam, Thomas George, Ebee Antony

When a petitioner explicitly states that the cause of action in a writ petition no longer survives, the court shall close the proceedings as infructuous.

Headnote:The petitioner sought relief regarding administrative decisions communicated by the respondent. Upon hearing the counsel, the court noted that the issues raised had become infructuous. The main issue was whether the grievances persist. The court reasoned that since the petitioner's counsel admitted the issue no longer survives, there was no legal cause of action remaining for adjudication. The writ petition is closed.

JUDGMENT

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue raised in this writ petition does not survive any more and requested that the matter be closed.

In view of the above submission, this writ petition is closed.

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :