SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 33666

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Bechu Kurian Thomas, J
Pranav G – Appellant
Versus
University Of Kerala – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 46374 OF 2024



Important Points

A court may dismiss a petition for non-prosecution if the petitioners demonstrate a persistent lack of interest by failing to appear for multiple scheduled hearings.

Subject

Civil Law - Dismissal for Default

Headnote

The proceedings concern a petition filed seeking relief, however, due to the persistent absence of representation for the petitioners over multiple hearings, the court scrutinized the interest of the parties in pursuing the litigation. The court determined that the lack of appearance signifies an abandonment of the cause. At issue is whether the petition should remain active despite the failure of the petitioners to appear and prosecute the case. The ratio decidendi is grounded in the principle that litigation requires active participation, and a persistent failure to appear warrants dismissal for want of prosecution. In the result, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ajay Krishnan S, Saisankar S, Dhanya Mohan, Parvathy Krishna, A. Murugan
For the Respondents: Thomas Abraham, R.t.pradeep, Niranjan T. Pradeep, Rajeev Jyothish George

Table of Content
1. dismissal of petition due to failure to prosecute. (Para 1 , 2)

JUDGMENT

For the last few postings, there has been no representation on behalf of the petitioners. The same has been recorded in the orders dated 30.01.2026 and 29.05.2026.

2. In view of the above, it is evident that petitioners are not interested to prosecute the matter.

Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top