SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 33827

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.Kunhikrishnan, J
R. Sattanathan – Appellant
Versus
Corporation Of Thiruvananthapuram – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 33492 OF 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: N. Krishna Prasad, A. Mohammed Faizal, P. Shanes Methar, Bharath Mohan, Deepak Varughese Mathew, Geethu Susan Varghese, Nithyakala V.
For the Respondents: Suman Chakravarthy, Deva

A petitioner has the right to withdraw a writ petition at any stage, which the court may grant, resulting in the dismissal of the petition as withdrawn.

Headnote:The proceedings concern an application submitted by the petitioners seeking the withdrawal of the current writ petition. Upon consideration of the request made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the High Court permitted the withdrawal of the matter. The primary issue before the Court was whether the petitioners were entitled to withdraw their writ petition. The Court, exercising its discretion and acknowledging the request of the counsel, determined that the petition could be disposed of as withdrawn. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition.

Permission granted. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top