SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 33928

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R. Ravi, J
Tharanath – Appellant
Versus
Power Grid Corporation Of India – Respondent
CRP NO. 240 OF 2020



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Babu Karukapadath, M.A.Vaheeda Babu, P.U.Vinod Kumar, Arya Raghunath, T.M.Muhammed Musthaq, Vaisakhi V
For the Respondents: Praveen K. Joy

A civil revision petition becomes infructuous and is liable to be closed when the parties report that the underlying dispute has been settled out of court.

Headnote:In the instant case, the petitioner sought revision against the order of the Additional District Court. The proceedings involved a dispute concerning land acquisition and compensation by the respondent corporation. The core issue before the Court was the maintainability and necessity of continuing the revision petition in light of subsequent developments. The ratio decidendi established that matters settled between the parties render the pending litigation infructuous, obviating the need for judicial adjudication. The outcome of the proceedings is that the civil revision petition is closed as infructuous.

ORDER

When the case is taken up today, it is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that the matter has been settled.

The civil revision petition is hence closed as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top