SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 34079

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R. Ravi, J
C.V. Shibu – Appellant
Versus
C.V. Thankappan – Respondent
OP(C) NO. 870 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Varghese C. Kuriakose, P.J. Jose, Amritha.J, Kuruvilla Mathew, Vipin C. Varghese

An appellate court or supervisory court may extend a stay of execution proceedings during the pendency of an appeal to allow a party sufficient time to seek stay orders from the First Appellate Court.

Headnote:The petitioner filed an Original Petition challenging an order of delivery passed during the pendency of an appeal before the District Court. The central statute involved is the Code of Civil Procedure, specifically regarding stay of execution proceedings during the pendency of an appeal. The court considered that the appeal is currently pending and records have been called for. The main issue was whether the stay of execution proceedings should be extended to allow the appellant to seek appropriate relief from the First Appellate Court. The court reasoned that in view of the pending appeal and the upcoming hearing date before the appellate forum, it was appropriate to extend the existing stay to prevent potential prejudice. The Original Petition is disposed of, with the court extending the stay granted for a further period of three months to enable the petitioner to move the First Appellate Court for necessary orders.

JUDGMENT

The prayer in this Original Petition is to set aside the order of delivery passed during the pendency of the appeal filed as AS No.14/2025 before the District Court, Ernakulam. When the case is taken up today, counsel for the petitioner submitted that the appeal stands posted on 18.07.2026 and records have already been called for.

In the above circumstances, this Original Petition is disposed of extending the stay granted by this Court for a further period of three months by which time, the petitioner may move the First Appellate Court for necessary orders.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top