SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 34101

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Ziyad Rahman A.A., J
P.V.Suresh – Appellant
Versus
Haripad Municipality – Respondent
WP(C) 13042 of 2024 | WP(C) 19836 of 2024 | WP(C) 24465 of 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: T.S.Harikumar, P.B.Sahasranaman
For the Respondents: M.R.Arunkumar, Arunkumar M.R. Karanavar

Property tax revisions by a municipality are legally unenforceable if the mandatory statutory requirement of final publication of the revised rates in newspapers, as prescribed under the relevant rules, has not been complied with.

Headnote:The cases involve a challenge against property tax revision demands issued by a Municipality. The petitioners contended that the revised rates lacked the mandatory final publication required by Rule 4 of the Kerala Municipality (Property Tax, Service Cess and Surcharge) Rules, 2011, and that demands exceeded the three-year limit prescribed under Section 539 of the Kerala Municipality Act. The Court found that the Municipality had failed to comply with the statutory requirement of publishing the final revised tax rates in two newspapers, as mandated by the Rules. The main issue was whether the Municipality could enforce revised tax rates without fulfilling the mandatory publication requirements prescribed by law. The court reasoned that since statutory notification is a condition precedent for the validity of revised tax rates, any demand issued without such publication is procedurally defective. The court clarified that liability for tax for future years shall reside at pre-revised rates until the legal procedure for publication is duly followed. The writ petitions were disposed of, the impugned orders and demands were quashed, and the interim orders were made absolute with directions to credit any previously collected excess amounts.

Table of Content
1. failure to fulfill mandatory publication requirements for tax revision renders the tax demand illegal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)

WP(C) NO. 13042 OF 2024

PETITIONER:
P.V.SURESH, AGED 58 YEARS
S/O. VASU, PUTHEN VEETTIL, THEKKE MANKUZHY,
PULLIKKANAKKU P.O., BHARANIKKAVU, ALAPPUZHA,
PIN - 690537
BY ADVS. SRI.T.S.HARIKUMAR
SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN

RESPONDENT:
THE HARIPAD MUNICIPALITY,
MUNICIPAL OFFICE, HARPAD P.O., ALAPPUZHA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN - 690514
BY ADV SRI.M.R.ARUNKUMAR
M.R.ARUN KUMAR,SC

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.06.2026, ALONG WITH WP(C).19836/2024, 24465/2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C) NO. 19836 OF 2024

PETITIONERS:
1 BAIJU P., S/O. M.PRABHAKARAN, KARIMKUTTIKAL HOUSE,
CHERAVALLY, KAYAMKULAM P.O., ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 690502
2 SINDHU V. AGED 48 YEARS
W/O BAIJU P., KARIMKUTTIKAL HOUSE,
CHERAVALLY,KAYAMKULAM P.O., ALAPPUZHA., PIN - 690502
BY ADVS. SRI.T.S.HARIKUMAR
SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN

RESPONDENT:
THE HARIPAD MUNICIPALITY,
MUNICIPAL OFFICE, HARPAD P.O, ALAPPUZHA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN - 690514
BY ADV SHRI.ARUNKUMAR M.R. KARANAVAR, SC, HARIPAD MUNICIPALITY

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.06.2026, ALONG WITH WP(C).13042/2024 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C) NO. 24465 OF 2024

PETITIONERS:
1 MATHEW KUNNEL ABRAHAM, AGED 72 YEARS
KUNNEL HOUSE, S/O. LATE G.ABRAHAM, AKAMKUDY P.O., NANGIARKULANGARA, ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 690513
2 MARIYAMMA DANIEL, AGED 68 YEARS
KUNNEL HOUSE, W/O. MATHEW KUNNEL ABRAHAM, AKAMKUDY P.O., NANGIARKULANGARA, ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 690513
BY ADVS. SRI.T.S.HARIKUMAR
SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN

RESPONDENTS:
1 THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT (RD) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001
2 THE HARIPAD MUNICIPALITY, MUNICIPAL OFFICE, HARIPAD P.O., ALAPPUZHA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN - 690514
3 THE SECRETARY, THE HARIPAD MUNICIPALITY, MUNICIPAL OFFICE, HARIPAD P.O., ALAPPUZHA, PIN - 690514
BY ADV SRI.M.R.ARUNKUMAR

WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02.06.2026, ALONG WITH WP(C).13042/2024 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

J U D G M E N T

(Dated this the 02nd day of June, 2026)

1. All these cases, the petitioners have challenged the respective orders and consequential demands issued by the Municipality, requiring the petitioners to pay the property tax in respect of their buildings. The challenge raised by the petitioners are mainly on two grounds. Firstly, it was contended that, the revised rates as demanded in the orders and notices were without making any final publication of the revised rates as contemplated under Rule 4 of the Kerala Municipality ( Property Tax Services and Surcharge) Rules, 2011. Secondly, it was contended that, the demand was made for the period beyond three years preceding to the date of demand, which is not contemplated under Section 539 of the the Kerala Municipality Act.

2. Earlier when these writ petitions came up for consideration on 05.11.2025, the following interim order was passed.

“In all these writ petitions, the common issue arises is that, while finalising the revised rate of building tax by the respondent Municipality, the mandatory publication as provided under Rule 4(4) of the Kerala Municipality (Property Tax, Service Cess and Surcharge) Rules, 2011 has not been made. As per the said Rules, final rates of basic property tax fixed by the Council of the Municipality and the date of its commencement shall be published by the Municipality, in the notice board of the office of the Municipality and also in two newspapers, having circulation in the area of the Municipality.

2. Evidently, in these cases, even though the decision taken by the Municipality as to the final rates, was on 23.08.2017, the publication thereof, as mandated under the said provisions in two newspapers, has not been

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top