IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. Badharudeen, J
Jithin M.V – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background concerning criminal allegations and victim identity. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding bail eligibility and statutory bars. (Para 2 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. application of the sc/st (poa) act bar to anticipatory bail. (Para 7) |
JUDGMENT
This appeal has been filed by the sole accused in Crime No.259/2026 of Payyannur Police Station, challenging the order passed in B.A No.482/2026 dated 08.05.2026, whereby the application for anticipatory bail filed by the appellant / accused was dismissed by the learned Special Judge.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the records.
3.The appellant herein is arrayed as accused in Crime No.259/2026 of Payyannur Police Station alleging commission of offences punishable u/s. 143(4) and 75(l) (ii) of BNS, 7 rlw s.8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, (the POCSO Act for short hereinafter) and u/ss.3(l)(w)(ii), 3(2)(va) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, (the SC/ST (PoA) Act for short hereinafter)
4.The prosecution allegation is that at 9.30 a.m on
13.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.