SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 34345

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.Abdul Hakhim, J
Muhammed Siraj C – Appellant
Versus
Managing Director Axis Bank Ltd – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 44533 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Vishnu G
For the Respondents: Saju N.A., G.Lekha, P.J.Flony, Uma.G.Krishnan, Revathy Vikraman, Aswin Sahajan, Bijo Francis

A Writ Petition is liable to be dismissed for default if the counsel for the petitioner remains absent during the scheduled hearing.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking relief against banking entities. The counsel for the petitioner remained absent during the proceedings. The core issue before the Court was the maintenance of the petition in the absence of representation. The Court found that the failure of the petitioner's counsel to appear rendered the petition liable for dismissal. The Writ Petition is dismissed for default.

Table of Content
1. dismissal of petition due to non-appearance of counsel. (Para 1)

JUDGMENT

1. The learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top