SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 34384

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Viju Abraham, J
Shyama Krishnan V – Appellant
Versus
Kerala Devaswom Recruitment Board – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: K.S. Sajeev Kumar, Bismi T.A., Ramesh P.N., Mohandas K. Chacko, Ansila C.A., Sarah Joseph, Sumeera Sundar, Sijimol S.
For the Respondents: T. Sanjay, Sanil Kumar G., Satheesh Kumar K., V.V. Nandagopala Nambiar, Vipin Das

JUDGMENT

When the matter was taken up for consideration on 23.03.2026, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought an adjournment stating that no instructions are forthcoming from the petitioner. Thereafter, when the matter was considered on 31.03.2026, there was no appearance for the petitioner. Today also, when the matter was called, there was no representation for the petitioner.

Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top