Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Anil K. Narendran, Muralee Krishna S., JJ
Vijith T.K. – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the original dispute and the subsequent contempt proceedings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. scope and limitations of the high court's supervisory jurisdiction under article 227 of the constitution. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. nature of writ jurisdiction and the necessity of establishing a statutory breach before ordering administrative action. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 4. absence of 'willful disobedience' in contempt proceedings when substantial administrative action has been taken. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
“C.R”
JUDGMENT
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The petitioners-applicants filed O.A.(EKM)No.461 of 2025 before the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Additional Bench at Ernakulam, invoking the provisions under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking an order directing the State of Kerala to consider and pass orders on Annexures A6 to A8 representations dated 07.02.2025, 07.02.2025 and 25.02.2025, respectively, made by them, within a time frame to be fixed by the Tribunal; and an order directing the State of Kerala, the 1st respondent therein, to extend the benefit of Annexure A1 All India Council for Tec
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
