Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Raja Vijayaraghavan V, K. V. Jayakumar, JJ
Abdul Nazer – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of offences under pocso act and ipc. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. summary of prosecution case and trial procedure. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. parties' contentions regarding testimonial evidence and infirmities. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. overview of evidence presented during trial. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. admissibility of sole testimony of the victim. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 6. evaluation of discrepancies and defense arguments. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 7. final confirmation of conviction based on evidence. (Para 35 , 36) |
JUDGMENT
K. V. Jayakumar, J.
1. This Criminal Appeal is preferred, impugning the judgment of the learned Special Judge (Special Court for Trial of Offences against Children (Additional Sessions Court-I), Manjeri dated 31.05.2019 in S.C. No.681 of 2014. The offences alleged against the appellant/accused are under Section 376(2), (f), (i) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 5(l), (m) and (n) r/w Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the POCSO Act’).
2. By the impugned judgment, the learned Special Judge convicted and sentenced the accuse
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
