SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 34643

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Kauser Edappagath, J
Rima Shaikh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 3074 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Amjath A.R.
For the Respondents: O.M.Shalina, Sreeja V.

Regular bail may be denied when there is prima facie evidence of serious offenses involving illegal entry and the use of forged official documents, particularly when investigations are ongoing and the conduct appears premeditated.

Headnote:The applicants filed a petition for regular bail under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, regarding allegations of illegal entry into the country without valid travel documents and the use of forged identification. The court examined the prosecution's allegations that the applicants, as foreign nationals, were employed without compliance with legal requirements and had utilized fraudulent documentation. The court found that the investigation revealed serious prima facie criminal conduct, including the use of forged identity documents, and determined that the gravity of the offences and ongoing investigation warranted the denial of bail. The main issue was whether the applicants were entitled to regular bail given the allegations of illegal entry and forgery. The court reasoned that in view of the premeditated nature of the criminal act, the absence of valid travel documents, and the use of forged identification, the applicants failed to demonstrate sufficient grounds for release at this preliminary stage of the investigation. The bail application stands dismissed.

Table of Content
1. overview of the petition seeking bail for alleged immigration law violations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. summary of rival contentions regarding the entitlement to bail. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's discretion to deny bail based on crime severity and forged documentation. (Para 6)

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15.06.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

O R D E R

This application is filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS) seeking regular bail.

2. The applicants are the accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime No.589/2026 of Museum Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram District. The offences alleged are punishable under Section 3 read with Section 21 and Section 8 read with Section 23(b) of the Immigration and Foreigners Act, 2025.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the applicants, who are alleged to be citizens of Bangladesh, entered India without any valid passport, visa or any other document and accused Nos.3 and 4, without informing the details of the applicants to the concerned authorities, employed them as therapists in the Pearl Wellness Unisex Spa at Jagathy operated by them. Thus, the applicants are alleged to have committed the aforesaid offences.

4. I have heard Sri.Amjath A.R., the learned counsel for the applicants, Smt.O.M.Shalina, the learned DSGI, and Smt.Sreeja V., the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

5. The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicants with the alleged crime; hence, they are entitled to bail. On the other hand, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor as well as the learned DSGI submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicants, and they are not entitled to bail at this stage.

6. The applicants were remanded to judicial custody on 24.04.2026. A perusal of the case diary would reveal that the accusation against the applicants is very serious, and it prima facie shows a premeditated criminal act on their part. The investigation conducted so far reveals that the applicants are Bangladesh nationals. The applicants have no case that they have any valid passport, visa or other travel documents. That apart, the investigation further reveals that the accused No.2 fraudulently obtained a forged Aadhar card by afÏxing her photograph on the same and has been using the same as genuine. Hence, the offences under Sections 336(2) and 342 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, have also been incorporated. The investigation is going on. Considering the nature of the crime, the gravity of the offence, the complicity of the applicants in it, and the facts and circumstances mentioned above, I am of the view that the applicants cannot be released on bail at this stage.

The bail application, accordingly, is dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top