SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 34660

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Bechu Kurian Thomas, J
Muhammed Asraf Machingal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 17851 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Muhammed Zain Shabeer P.P., Alex K.John, Rithin Gopi T.G., Riyas B.S., Anish M.M., Shibu Babu, Jasni Jalal, Dhanya Palan
For the Respondents: Unni Sebastian Kappen

The High Court can issue a writ of mandamus to compel the competent authority to dispose of a pending administrative application, such as one for the appointment of a Notary, within a fixed and reasonable timeframe if the application has remained unaddressed for an unreasonable period.

Headnote:The petitioner, a legal practitioner, sought the intervention of the High Court due to the non-disposal of his application for appointment as a Notary. The court examined the delay in processing the application and the existence of a prior interim directive issued on 25.05.2026 to reserve one vacancy. The central issue was whether the competent authority could be directed to adjudicate a pending application within a specific timeframe. The court reasoned that in the interest of justice and procedural fairness, a pending application warrants timely disposal to avoid undue administrative delay. The writ petition was disposed of with a directive to the competent authority to process and pass orders on the application within two months.

Table of Content
1. court intervention to mandate timely administrative decision-making for pending applications. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15.06.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS., J

W.P.(C) No.17851 of 2026

Dated this the 15th day of June, 2026

J U D G M E N T

1. Petitioner is an Advocate and he is a member of Pattambi Bar Association. He alleges that his application for appointment as a Notary, submitted as Ext.P1, has not been disposed of till date. The limited relief sought for by the petitioner is for a direction to consider his application in a time bound manner.

2. On 25.05.2026, this Court had directed the respondents not to fill up one vacancy of Notary in the State. Thereafter, the learned Government Pleader has submitted that, petitioner’s application has not yet been considered.

3. In view of the above, this writ petition can be disposed of with a direction. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the competent authority under the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P1 application for appointment of a Notary filed as NOTRE/2024/00169 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within an outer period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top