IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
2026:KER:41975
WP(C) NO. 11995 OF 2025
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE 2026 / 22ND JYAISHTA, 1948
PETITIONERS :
1 JAYAKUMAR RAGHAVAN S/O RAGHAVAN
AGED 54 YEARS
MANGALATH HOUSE,
NANGIARKULANGARA P.O,
HARIPAD, ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 690 513.
2 SUMA JAYAN, W/O JAYAKUMAR RAGHAVAN
AGED 52 YEARS
PUTHANKANDATHIL HOUSE,
KANJOOR,
CHEPPAL, ALAPPUZHA, PIN – 690 507.
BY ADVS.
SHRI.HAPPYMON BABU
SMT.BLESSY MARY SEBASTIAN
SHRI.ATHUL M. JOSHEY
RESPONDENTS :
1 WEB INFORMATION MANAGER
UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF INFORMATION & BROADCASTING
JOINT SECRETARY (P&A),
M/O INFORMATION& BROADCASTING,
ROOM NO.552,
A WING SHASTRI BHAVAN,
NEW DELHI, PIN – 110 001.
2 SECRETARY
MINISTRY OF ELECTRONICS AND INFORMATION 6,
CGO COMPLEX LODHI ROAD,
NEW DELHI, PIN – 110 003.
3 JASMI SUDHIR
D/O T.C SUGHATHAN
THINAYATHU HOUSE,
MOOTHAKUNNAM P.O.,
MOOTHAKUNNAM,
PARAVUR, PIN – 683 516.
BY ADVS.
O.M.SHALINA, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
SMT.K.V.RASHMI
SMT.LAKSHMI
SHRI.RAHUL ANIL
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12.06.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
W.P.(C) No. 11995 of 2025
Dated this the 12th day of June, 2026
JUDGMENT
Petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents to immediately remove the defamatory photographs, videos and voice recordings posted by the third respondent on social media platforms such as WhatsApp, as well as any other platforms where they have been shared. They seek a further direction to refrain the third respondent from harassment, threats or publication of any personal content relating to petitioners. Petitioners have also sought for compensation for the damage caused to their family life, dignity, and privacy.
2. The learned counsel for the third respondent submitted that the defamatory content, including photographs, videos and voice recordings, allegedly posted on social media platforms such as WhatsApp, and other platforms where they have been shared, do not exist now as all have been deleted. It was also submitted that the third respondent does not intend to upload any such content further. The aforesaid submissions are recorded.
3. Since the alleged social media content indicating the presence of the petitioners have already been removed, nothing further survives for consideration in this writ petition, as far as relief No.i to iii is concerned.
4. As far as relief No.iv is concerned, the claim for compensation is a matter which requires appreciation of disputed question of facts, and is not a matter in which the jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India should be exercised. Remedy of the petitioners for that purpose is to approach the appropriate forum.
5. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed, as far as relief Nos.(i) to (iii) are concerned while the liberty of the petitioners to initiate appropriate proceedings, for relief No.iv, before the appropriate forum, is reserved, if available in law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.