IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Bechu Kurian Thomas, J
Hemanth R. Nair – Appellant
Versus
University of Kerala – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 18678 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of facts regarding migration and denial of certificate. (Para 1) |
| 2. university cannot restrict mid-term migration between recognized institutions absent statutory prohibition. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS., J
W.P.(C) No.18678 of 2026
Dated this the 12th day of June, 2026
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner completed his 4th semester BE Mechanical Engineering from Amal Jyothi, College of Engineering and obtained a Migration Certificate and completed his course from Vinayaka Mission’s Kirupananda Variyar Engineering College. According to the petitioner, both the aforementioned colleges are recognized by the AICTE as well as UGC and all other educational agencies. However, after petitioner completed his course, he applied to the first respondent university for an eligibility certificate as he obtained admission at TKM Institute of Management, Kollam for MBA. By Ext.P12, petitioner’s request was refused, pointing out that, as per the prevailing regulations of the University, mid-term course migration or credit transfer was not permitted. It is further stated that the graduate degree obtained will be recognized by the University of Kerala, only if such degrees are obtained in accordance with AICTE regulations through full time regular mode and within the prescribed duration, from an AICTE recognized institution.
2. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner had completed his full time regular course within the prescribed duration at an AICTE approved institution. It was also submitted that the objection raised in Ext.P12 regarding the mid-term course migration is contrary to the binding precedent of this Court in Jobin John v. University of Kerala , W.P.(C) No.30782 of 2021 and therefore, the respondents are bound to issue an eligibility certificate to the petitioner.
3. I have heard the learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2, the learned counsel for AICTE as well as the learned Standing Counsel for the fourth respondent.
4. In the decision in Jobin John (Supra), a learned Single Judge of this Court had observed that there is no restriction on transfer from one University to another, if both the colleges had approval of AICTE. In the instant case, there is no dispute that Amal Jyothi, College of Engineering and Vinayaka Mission’s Kirupananda Variyar Engineering College are both, recognized by AICTE. There is no prohibition or restriction by any statute for mid-term migration. Also there is no restriction for transfer, under any law for the time being in force, from one University to another. The decision in Jobin John (Supra) is binding upon the first respondent as they were parties to the said case. Hence the first respondent cannot wriggle out of the said precedent, by raising legally untenable objections, repeatedly. Ext.P12 is thus illegal. In such circumstances, I am satisfied that the petitioner is entitled to the reliefs, as sought for.
Accordingly, Ext.P12 is quashed and there will be a direction to respondent Nos.1 and 2 to issue an eligibility certificate to the petitioner to enable him to pursue his higher studies. The eligibility certificate shall be issued to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within an outer period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.