SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 35115

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.K. SAJID – Appellant
Versus
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER – Respondent


AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 31.12.2025 IN WOA NO.89 OF 2024 OF WAKF TRIBUNAL, KOZHIKODE

THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEALS (WAQF) WAS FINALLY HEARD ON 26.05.2026, THE COURT ON 09.06.2026 PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Muralee Krishna, J.

1. The 1st respondent in W.O.A.No.89 of 2024 on the file of the Wakf Tribunal, Kozhikode (the ‘Tribunal’ for short) filed this Miscellaneous First Appeal under Section 83(9) of the Unified Waqf Management, Empowerment, Efficiency, and Development Act, 1995 (‘Waqf Act’ for short), challenging the order dated 31.12.2025 passed by the Tribunal in that W.O.A

2. Going by the averments in the W.O.A, the appellant is the tenant in the building bearing door No.CC 866 of Kannur Corporation. Claiming that the tenancy of the appellant has expired and he is in unauthorized and illegal occupation of the building, the respondents 2 and 3, who are the office bearers of the Wakf, viz., Camp Bazar Muhiyidheen Rifayi Shaduli approached the 1st respondent Chief Executive Officer of the Kerala State Wakf Board (the ‘Board’ for short) by filing a compliant under Section 54 of the Waqf Act. Based on the said complaint, the 1st respondent issued a notice under Section 54(1) of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top