SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 35314

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Murali Purushothaman, J
Jees Paul – Appellant
Versus
Regional Passport Office – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 20332 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Abi Benny Areeckal, M.A. Joseph Manavalan, Mariya Simon
For the Respondents: Dayasindhu Shreehari N.S., Jibu P. Thomas

A citizen is entitled to obtain a Customized Police Clearance Certificate while criminal proceedings are pending, provided they have secured court permission to travel and obtain such clearance.

Headnote:The petitioner sought a direction to the authorities to issue a Police Clearance Certificate (PCC) for employment purposes despite the pendency of a criminal case. The authorities issued an adverse report citing the pending case and refused to issue a standard PCC. The court determined that the pendency of a criminal case does not inherently disqualify an individual from obtaining a PCC, provided judicial permission for travel and certificate issuance exists as reflected in prior court orders. The central issue was whether a PCC could be withheld due to an adverse police verification report where criminal proceedings are pending. Applying the principle established in Siju v. Regional Passport Officer, the court held that a citizen remains entitled to travel and obtain a PCC if they have secured necessary permissions from the court seized of the criminal matter. The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to issue a Customized Police Clearance Certificate disclosing the pending criminal case and the judicial permissions granted within one week.

Table of Content
1. summary of facts involving employment-based passport requirements and existing criminal litigation. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments regarding the necessity of police verification versus individual rights during pending criminal cases. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court mandate for the issuance of a 'customized police clearance certificate' based on judicial precedent. (Para 5)

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is the holder of an Indian passport. He secured employment in Australia. Accordingly, he applied for issuance of a Police Clearance Certificate. Since there was delay in issuing the Police Clearance Certificate, the petitioner has filed this writ petition for a direction to the 1st respondent to consider his application, expeditiously.

2. The petitioner states that he was an accused in C.C. No. 631 of 2014 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Adimaly. However, by Ext.P2 judgment, the said court acquitted the petitioner. The petitioner further states that he is the 10th accused in C.C. No.1023 of 2023 on the files of the same court and by Ext.P4 order, the court granted him permission to go abroad for a period of two years and exempted him from personal appearance subject to conditions. By Ext.P5 order, the petitioner was also permitted to obtain Police Clearance Certificate from the Regional Passport Authority.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Senior Panel Counsel and the learned Government Pleader.

4. A statement has been filed by the learned Senior Panel Counsel on behalf of respondents 1 and 2 wherein it is stated that on receipt of the application of the petitioner for Police Clearance Certificate, the 1st respondent sought for Police Verification Report and the 3rd respondent submitted an adverse report stating that the petitioner is the accused in C.C. No.1023 of 2023 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Adimaly. The learned Senior Panel Counsel submits that since the petitioner is involved in a criminal case, only a Customized Police Clearance Certificate can be issued, that too, only on orders from this Court.

5. This Court in Siju v. Regional Passport Officer [2021 KHC 1002] has held that even if there is a criminal case pending, one is entitled to travel with the permission of the court before which the case is pending.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to issue a Customized Police Clearance Certificate to the petitioner, showing the details of the criminal case pending against him and Exts.P4 and P5 orders. In view of the urgency pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the needful shall be done within one week from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top