Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Sathish Ninan, P. Krishna Kumar, JJ
Fayis K – Appellant
Versus
Suman V.P – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dismissal of appeal due to failure of the appellant to appear for representation. (Para 1 , 2) |
Sathish Ninan,
&
P.Krishna Kumar, JJ.
Mat.Appeal.No.752 of 2022
Dated this the 17th day of June, 2026
JUDGMENT
Sathish Ninan, J.
1. When the appeal was listed for hearing on 10/06/2026, there was no representation for the appellants. Accordingly, it was adjourned to this day for hearing.
2. Today also, there is no representation for the appellants. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
