THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12.06.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, J.

W. P. (C) No. 18709 of 2026

Dated this the 12th day of June, 2026

JUDGMENT

This Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:

“I. to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any

other appropriate writ, direction or order

commanding the 2nd respondent to register the

new sale deed of the petitioner in accordance with

law;

II. to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any

other appropriate writ, direction or order

commanding the 2nd respondent to consider

Exhibit P6 representation of the petitioner and

register the new sale deed of the petitioner in a

time bound manner;”

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the 2nd respondent is refusing to register the sale deed by stating that there is an order of attachment imposed by a Family Court. He also contended that, the attachment has been lifted and the same has been communicated to the 2nd respondent, as per Ext.P3, as early as in 2010 and even then the 2nd respondent is not acting upon it.

4. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submitted that the petitioner has not produced any sale deed before the SRO, as contended in this Writ Petition. He also submitted that there is no attachment existing over the property now and the 2nd respondent will register the sale deed, if the petitioner produces the same.

In the light of the submissions made at the Bar and considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the petitioner to produce the sale deed before the 2nd respondent for registration within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. If the same is done, the 2nd respondent shall register the sale deed, as per law, within a period of two weeks therefrom.