Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Raja Vijayaraghavan V, K. V. Jayakumar, JJ
Athulya Info Media Private Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Jio Star India Pvt Ltd – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the background regarding the conditional stay order passed by the specialized tribunal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. limitations on high court supervisory jurisdiction over specialized tribunal interlocutory orders and maintainability of appeals. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. final confirmation that the discretion exercised by the lower forum did not warrant appellate interference. (Para 11 , 12) |
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 10.06.2026 IN WP(C) NO.19093 OF 2026 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19.06.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Raja Vijayaraghavan V, J.
1. The above captioned Writ Appeal is preferred against judgment dated 10.06.2026 passed by the learned Single Judge as per which, the court while refusing to interfere with the order passed by the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT), New Delhi in Misc. Application. No. 130 of 2016 in Broadcasting Petition No. 429 of 2025 granted a breathing time to the appellant to comply with the conditions imposed by the Appellate Tribunal.
2. We have heard the submissions of Sri. Aljo K Joseph, the learned counsel ap
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
