SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 48529

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM


THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH


WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2026/7TH SRAVANA, 1948


BAIL APPL. NO. 4008 OF 2026

CRIME NO.469/2026 OF PONNANI POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM


PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2:

1 NASEER

AGED 37 YEARS, S/O SIDHIQUE,

CHIPPANTE HOUSE, PUDHUPONNANI, PONNANI P.O., PONNANI,

MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679586

2 SHOUKATH VELUTHAMMATHINTE

AGED 37 YEARS, S/O SIDDIQUE,

VELUTHAMMATHINTE HOUSE, PUDHUPONNANI, PONNANI P.O.,

PONNANI, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679586


BY ADVS.

SHRI.SIDHARTH O.

SHRI.SUSANTH SHAJI

SHRI.ALBIN A. JOSEPH

SHRI.ANSHID E.K.

SMT.NEKHA VARGHESE


RESPONDENTS/STATE/INVESTIGATING OFFICER:

1 STATE OF KERALA

REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM,

PIN - 682031

2 STATION HOUSE OFFICER

PONNANI POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM,

PIN - 679584


BY ADV.

SMT.ANEEDA BEEGUM, SR. PP

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.07.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

O R D E R

This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, BNSS), seeking pre-arrest bail.

The applicants are the accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime No.469/2026 of Ponnani Police Station, Malappuram District. The offences alleged are punishable under Section 288 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 3 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908.

The prosecution case, in short, is that, on 04.05.2026 at 01:20 p.m., the applicants threw a fire cracker at the de facto complainant’s house when he was present in the house and thereby committed the aforesaid offences.

I have heard Sri. Sidharth O., the learned counsel for the applicants and Smt. Aneeda Beegum, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

The learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the above crime. The counsel further submitted that no materials are on record to connect the applicants with the alleged crime; hence, they are entitled to get bail. The learned Senior Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, submitted that the alleged incident occurred as a part of the intentional criminal acts of the applicants, and if they are released on bail at this stage, it will affect the course of the investigation.

I went through the FIS. The de facto complainant did not see the applicants throwing fire cracker to his house. According to him, when he checked the CCTV footage of the nearby house, it was revealed that at the time of the alleged incident, a procession of UDF was going on and the applicants were travelling on a scooter behind the procession. No damages or injuries have been caused to any property or person. Considering the allegations made against the applicants, their custodial interrogation seems unnecessary. For these reasons, I find this to be an appropriate case to grant pre-arrest bail to the applicants.

In the result, the application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(i) The applicants shall be released on bail in the event of their arrest on executing a bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh only) each with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer, as the case may be.

(ii) The applicants shall fully cooperate with the investigation, including subjecting themselves to the deemed police custody for discovery, if any, as and when demanded.

(iii) The applicants shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.00 a.m. and 11.00 a.m. every Saturday until further orders. They shall also appear before the investigating officer as and when required.

(iv) The applicants shall not commit any offence of a like nature while on bail.

(v) The applicants shall not attempt to contact any of the prosecution witnesses, directly or through any other person, or in any other way try to tamper with the evidence or influence any witnesses or other persons related to the investigation.

(vi) The applicants shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The application, if any, for deletion/modification of bail conditions or cancellation of bail on the grounds of violating the bail conditions shall be filed at the jurisdictional court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top