SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52194

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. Kunhikrishnan, J
SHIHAB – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LR) – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 27418 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: K.J. Manu Raj
For the Respondents: Joemon Antony

The court directed the revenue authorities to process an application filed under Section 27A of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008, within a specified time limit.

Headnote:(A) Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 - Section 27A - Application for land classification - Direction to authorities to consider the Form-6 application and pass orders within a stipulated time frame. (Para 4)

Issues: Whether the respondents should be directed to consider the petitioner's application under Section 27A of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus for the consideration of a form-6 application under the kerala conservation of paddy land and wetland act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. the court determines that a time-bound direction for the consideration of the application is appropriate. (Para 4)

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10.08.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.

W.P.(C.).No.27418 of 2026

Dated this the 10th day of August, 2026

JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed with following prayers:

i) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P1 application after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner;

ii) Declare that the property of the petitioner’s property having an extent of 1.89 Ares of property lying in Survey No. 54/5-2-2, 54/6-2-2, 54/ 7-2 of Perumbavoor Village in Kunnathunad Taluk in Block No.18, Ernakulam District is a paddy land and is a purayidom.

iii) issue such other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the circumstances of the case;

iv). Dispense with the production of English translation of the vernacular Exhibits produced in the Writ Petition [ c ] (SIC)

2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P1 Form - 6 application filed by the petitioner under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P1 within a time frame.

Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:

1. The 2nd respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P1 application to the 1st respondent/Authorised O period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

2. The 1st respondent/Authorised O to consider the Ext.P1 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 2nd respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the report. I make it clear that the 1st respondent is free to pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law.

3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before respondents 1 and 2 for compliance.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top