IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. Kunhikrishnan, J
SHIHAB – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LR) – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 27418 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus for the consideration of a form-6 application under the kerala conservation of paddy land and wetland act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. the court determines that a time-bound direction for the consideration of the application is appropriate. (Para 4) |
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10.08.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
W.P.(C.).No.27418 of 2026
Dated this the 10th day of August, 2026
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed with following prayers:
i) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P1 application after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner;
ii) Declare that the property of the petitioner’s property having an extent of 1.89 Ares of property lying in Survey No. 54/5-2-2, 54/6-2-2, 54/ 7-2 of Perumbavoor Village in Kunnathunad Taluk in Block No.18, Ernakulam District is a paddy land and is a purayidom.
iii) issue such other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the circumstances of the case;
iv). Dispense with the production of English translation of the vernacular Exhibits produced in the Writ Petition [ c ] (SIC)
2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P1 Form - 6 application filed by the petitioner under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P1 within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 2nd respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P1 application to the 1st respondent/Authorised O period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
2. The 1st respondent/Authorised O to consider the Ext.P1 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 2nd respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the report. I make it clear that the 1st respondent is free to pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law.
3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before respondents 1 and 2 for compliance.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.