SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52936

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Viju Abraham, J
BAVIJESH R – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 27844 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: C.S. Manu, S.K. Premraj, V. Saritha, Dilu Joseph, C.A. Anupaman, T.B. Sivaprasad, Neethu K. Shaji, C.Y. Vijay Kumar, Manju E.R., Alint Joseph, Paul Jose, Dainy Davis, Mahesh Kumar K.
For the Respondents: Maya Chandra, V. Vinay

The court directed the Director of General Education to decide on a revision petition against a staff fixation order within two months, ensuring a fair hearing for the petitioner and other affected parties.

Headnote:(A) Administrative Law - Revision Petition - Expeditious Disposal - Direction issued to the Director of General Education to consider and pass orders on a revision petition challenging a staff fixation order within a stipulated timeframe after providing a hearing to all affected parties. (Para 3)

Issues: Whether the revision petition against the staff fixation order should be disposed of expeditiously.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13.08.2026, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

VIJU ABRAHAM, J.

W.P.(C) No.27844 of 2026 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Dated this the 13th day of August, 2026

JUDGMENT

Aggrieved by Ext.P18 Staff Fixation Order, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P19 Revision Petition before the 2nd respondent-Director of General Education and he seeks for an expeditious disposal of the same.

Heard the learned Government Pleader also.

After hearing both sides, I am inclined to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P19 Revision Petition submitted by the petitioner, after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner, the 4th respondent and any other affected parties. A decision in this regard shall be taken within an outer limit of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. While taking a decision as directed above, the 2nd respondent shall advert to Ext.P13 Government Order and Exts.P14 and P15 judgments, copies of which, along with Ext.P19 Revision Petition, shall be produced before the 2nd respondent along with a certified copy of this judgment.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top