SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Online)(KER) 24757

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
CN RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, K VINOD CHANDRAN, JJ
ASSOCIATE TRADE LINKS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WRIT APPEAL 1976/2011



Tax assessments can be rectified based on verifiable evidence of payments made, emphasizing the need for cooperative verification between taxpayers and financial institutions.

Headnote:

Taxation - Assessment Appeal - Sections 64, 65 - Court analyzes credit of tax payments, determining that a proper verification process is essential for rectifying the tax assessment based on evidence of payments made.

Fact of the Case:

The appeal challenges the tax assessment alleging short credit of tax paid. The appellant claims that payments made were not fully credited, while the government pleader confirms receipt according to records.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the dispute regarding short credit of tax did not warrant an appeal, as no disagreement existed over turnover or tax rates. It ordered the Bank to assist the appellant in verifying tax payments.

Issues: Whether short credit of tax constitutes a disputable assessment issue that requires filing an appeal.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that an assessment could be rectified if the taxpayer provides proof of excess payments. A collaborative verification with the bank is necessary for rectifying tax credits.

Final Decision: Writ appeal allowed with directions for the bank to issue a certificate confirming tax payments.

J U D G M E N T

C .N. Ramachandran Nair , J Appellant challenges assessment in this Court for the simple reason that tax paid is not fully given credit. Learned Single Judge recorded submission from the Government Pleader that the payment received as per Government records are seen credited in the assessment order. In view of the submission made by the Government Pleader the learned Single Judge held that the dispute if at all exists between the parties should be settled in appeal. Hence leaving freedom to file appeal to the appellant, writ petition was closed, against which this writ appeal is filed before us.

2. We agree with the counsel for the appellant that short credit of tax is not a dispute in assessment either with regard to turnover or with regard to rate of tax and so much so, there is no need to file appeal in the matter. Senior Government Pleader also does not raise any dispute on this issue inasmuch as, according to him assessment could be rectified if assessee produces proof of the payment of tax in excess of the amount credited in the accounts. The appellant's counsel pointed out that payments were made through the cheques of Bank of Baroda and they are not co- operating with the appellant as account is NPA and so much so, appellant will not be able to produce evidence. We do not think the Bank can decline a certificate about the details of the cheques issued by the appellant during the year, towards the payment of tax, and whether the cheques issued were honoured by debiting appellant's account and by making payment to the treasury through SBT. The situation is same if the Bank had issued any Demand Draft in favour of the Assessing Officer, also towards the payment of tax at appellant's request. We do not think we should drag the Bank to this Court for instructing them to verify details and issue a certificate to the appellant for them to produce before the Assessing Officer for verification and for giving credit of actual amount of tax paid. Accordingly there will be a direction to the Manager, Bank of Baroda, Aluva Branch to verify details being furnished by the appellant and issue certificate to the appellant after verifying the accounts giving details of payment of tax made by the appellant through the said Bank. It is for the appellant to produce the certificate of the bank and furnish details of the cheques and Demand Drafts given to the department before the Assessing Officer to verify with his records and also with the Treasury as well and give credit for the payments actually made. The Assessing Officer is directed to rectify the assessment for the year 1997- 1998 giving credit for actual payment of tax after verification as directed above within one month from the date of production of the particulars by the appellant as above.

3. Since the appellant has furnished details of cheques said to have been submitted to the department, we defer the recovery proceedings by two months from now. Recovery thereafter will continue for the balance due based on fresh rectification orders issued by the Assessing Officer. Writ appeal is allowed modifying the judgment of the learned Single Judge as above.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top