SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(KER) 33911

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K VINOD CHANDRAN, J
GEORGEKUTTY CHERIAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) 20543/2017



Legal compliance requires examination of land status reports prior to decisions on property utilization applications.

Headnote:

Land - Property Rights - Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008 - Section 5(4)(i), Kerala Land Utilization Order, 1967 - Summary: The court interpreted the provisions of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, emphasizing the need for a report on land usage before a decision on reclamation applications could be made.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner claims ownership of land classified as 'nilam' in revenue records, despite it being reclaimed land in a residential area. The petitioner is seeking a timely decision on their application concerning the land under the Kerala Land Utilization Order.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that a report from the Local Level Monitoring Committee and the Kerala State Remote Sensing and Environment Center was necessary before the District Collector could address the petitioner’s application.

Issues: Whether the District Collector should consider the pending application without evaluating the property's current condition through the necessary reports.

Ratio Decidendi: It is essential to examine the actual status of land through official reports before making decisions on land utilization applications, ensuring compliance with statutory requirements.

Final Decision: Writ petition disposed of with directions for further procedure.

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is aggrieved with the fact that the land, owned by the petitioner, having a total extent of 11.56 Ares, comprised in Block No.7 in Re-Survey No.323/6 Kavumbhagom Village, is shown as 'nilam' in the revenue records. The said property is included in the draft data bank prepared under Section 5(4)(i) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008 as reclaimed land. The petitioner's property is situated in a thickly populated residential area. The boundaries of the land are surrounded by residential plots and is a garden land. It is also submitted that there is no paddy cultivation and the land is unfit for any paddy cultivation, is the contention raised. The petitioner filed Ext.P3 application, before the 2nd respondent, which is pending consideration. The prayer of the petitioner is to direct the District Collector, the 2nd respondent herein, to consider and dispose of Ext.P3, an application filed under Clause (6) of the Kerala Land Utilization Order, 1967, (for brevity “KLU Order”), within a reasonable time.

2.Since the land is not included in the draft data bank and the description is shown as 'reclaimed land' in the revenue records, it is only proper that a report is received from the Local Level Monitoring Committee (LLMC) and Kerala State Remote Sensing and Environment Center (KSREC) before consideration of Ext.P3 application by the 2nd respondent, if the same is filed in original and pending before the authority.

3.The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition before the Agricultural Officer, the Convener of the Local Level Monitoring Committee, along with the copy of the Field Measurement Book and Survey and Sub-division numbers with respect to the property obtained from the concerned Village Officer. The Agricultural Officer shall then seek a report of the lie and nature of the property as it remained on the date of coming into force of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008, from the Director, Kerala State Remote Sensing and Environment Center (KSREC), Vikas Bhavan, C-Block, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala 695 033. On the direction of the Agricultural Officer so to do, the petitioner shall remit the required fees in the name of the petitioner, C/o. the concerned Agricultural Officer (showing the full address) before the KSREC for obtaining such report and produce such receipt before the Agricultural Officer. The Agricultural Officer shall then obtain the report and map from the KSREC, who shall issue the same on the strength of the receipt produced by the Agricultural Officer. The Agricultural Officer, on receipt of the report, shall require the LLMC to conduct a physical inspection of the property and submit a report before the District Collector as to the lie and nature of the property, as it exists at present, along with the report from the KSREC. A copy of the report of physical inspection conducted by the LLMC and of the report of the KSREC shall be issued to the petitioner on an application made.

4.On receipt of the report of the LLMC, along with the satellite map and report forwarded by the KSREC, the 2nd respondent shall issue notice to the petitioner and consider the application, within a period of two months from that date.

The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top